How to Spot a Fake Link Removal Request
Are your links unnatural or do they grow on trees?
When Google invented “unnatural links” by simply deciding that some links are unnatural while others are not they also created the problem of large scale “negative SEO“.
Then they professed to have the solution for their self-created problem, the disavow tool and the process of link removal associated with it. I don’t want to explain that whole absurdity again.
Today I want to show on a little example how the outcome of the unnatural link nonsense looks like.
People are sending link removal requests to bloggers and webmasters. Some of these look so fake that they are more likely part of a Google sabotage campaign to remove links to the competition.
For example in case you rank above me I can hire someone to ask all the people who link to you to remove the links.
On a side note. There are no “unnatural links”. That’s a made up term by Google to discredit link building. Do links grow on trees? No. All links are unnatural.
The link removal request I refuse to comply with
Usually I reply to link removal requests and remove the links or at least try to confirm the identity of the sender but not when they look as fake as this one:
I added some red flags to the message to demonstrate how to spot a fake link removal request. I don’t say this one has to be fake.
It could be real but so low quality that it looks fake. Anyway, you can’t remove any links based on such a request. That way you would potentially hurt the site in question.
You may wonder why I didn’t remove mail addresses and names from that screen shot.
There are many reasons. One of them is that the guy who sent me this also advertises his services with mail addresses and names of third parties.
Also I want to make it public so that other people who have been approached by the same person, Jerameel, become a bit more cautious.
Last but not least this will help my readers to learn how to deal with such semi-anonymous mass mailings.
Why do I think it’s a mass mailing?
Let’s take a look at my annotations:
1. The message has been written from a free mail account anyone can get within a few minutes. Anybody can make an identity on Gmail.
Apparently the account has been created with the sole purpose of this link removal campaign judging from the “name”.
2. Guess what, this is of course not my mail address. This is the address of a list the sender has set up. I’ve never heard of it.
The message is going out to more than one address then. Only the URLs are customized for each one.
3. Whenever I get a message saying “Good Day”, “Dear Sirs” etc. These impersonal greetings are clearly sent to dozens, hundreds or thousands of people.
I usually delete it immediately as spam because there is no name in it and that person apparently has not even looked up my site to look for it.
4. Usually a typo could mean that a message is real, after all we all make mistakes, me too, all the time. This is a mistake a spell check would easily notice and highlight in red.
Thus the sender obviously hasn’t looked at the message before hitting send. It’s rather a typical mistake that happens when automated programs mess around with proper line breaks.
5. Here you’d expect at least some clue who the sender is. I want to see who the person sending the message is, what’s the job description, phone number or at least last name.
Sadly the only thing I see in the signature is the first name. Thus I had to look up the last name in the “sender” field.
Who is Jerameel?
OK. There was a last name. Thus I tried to locate the person who has sent me the message. The first page I’ve found for the name was a “people per hour” profile.
Jerameel seems to specialize in link removal. That’s possible. Does he work for the company he writes for? There is no way to find out. How much of an expert can he be with
- zero reviews
- “rookie” level
- an hourly rate of 4€?
He also seem to be from the Philippines and this profile is his sole online presence. Even taking into account the lower living costs in the Philippines 4€ is too low.
Btw. I wouldn’t even be able to survive charging 40. So Jerameel is a low paid outsourcing drone anybody can hire for peanuts to remove links.
Would I recommend to hire someone like that to deal with a Google penalty? No. I have also looked up the company he allegedly represents.
They evidently suffer from a very harsh penalty according to some tools. They still rank top 10 for [web design los angeles] though .- the long tail keyphrase they apparently optimize for.
An LA based internet marketing should be able to afford to pay for a real expert.
I don’t say Jerameel is knowingly implementing a “negative SEO” campaign against the business he claims to represent. It’s possible though.
It’s in my opinion more likely that someone from your competition is hiring a low level “expert” at the other end of the world than you do.
In case you really care about your site why would you take such a big risk? Sites like Fiverr and other low level “job boards” are rarely used by true experts.
What do the comments look like in the first place?
BTW: the links Jerameel wants to have removed look perfectly OK. They are not spammy. The links in them are even nofollow. Thus I refuse to remove them in this case:
Real SEO experts and link removal requests
Have you gotten similar fake looking link removal requests? Do not heed them without any confirmation.
I once had to mail back and forth a few times to make sure the sender of the message is really associated with the website in question. I don’t have time all day to offer you link removal services for free.
I’m too righteous to charge you for link removal but I at least want to have something I can write about my readers can learn from.
I also sincerely hope that the people involved here will learn a well. I don’t expect Google to learn and change their politics but it’s always important to point out the absurdity of such processes.
BTW. in case you want to hire real SEO experts from the Philippines or somewhere else in the majority world feel free to ask me.
Jason Acidre and Venchito Tampon are some surefire choices from the Philippines.
Hat tip to all business owners: send your own link removal request from your business mail address.
Let the real experts locate the probably dangerous links and then spend some time writing real personal messages that don’t ostracize like this generic one.
Thanks for the nice info..i also have a blog and i have also received few letters bt never noticed this things ..:)
Dont know how do i react on this, but sir if this person is good and hard working but new in this field, do you think this kind of discussion make his reputation bad?
I agree with Noman, you could probably have done a bit more digging before outing a freelancer. Even if this is neg SEO they may be an innocent party.
Also this made me chuckle:
“Usually a type could mean that a message is real, after all we all make mistakes, me too,”
The post is right though. People should be more scrupulous with link removal and the inconsistencies you highlight can be attributed to other types of communication spam as well.
Noman: I have thought for a while before publishing this. Anonymizing this would have made the post almost worthless. Jerameel can answer here in the comments and I can update this too.
As I didn’t reply to the mail until now I bet they disavowed my site anyway in case the message was legit. So I am most probably already affected negatively by this.
The whole situation is absurd as noted above. Hiding the identity of people and companies who are responsible for this mess is not the right way to go IMHO.
In case this is a negative SEO scheme I am even obliged to uncover this.
toby: As noted above, I have been evaluating this for a while until I decided to publish this with names included. The responsibility for this problem is with Google. Jerameel is rather a victim like me and other webmasters and bloggers.
BTW.: I meant “typo” not “type” so I even made a mistake here as a proof of concept LOL!
Interesting post Tad – as some webmasters become more familiar with genuine requests it presents a massive opportunity for those carrying out negative SEO.
While using a Gmail account might raise alarm bells for some, there are simple ghosting methods that could make it look very official
Thanks for Sharing this type of useful information about link removal ! I have a also a website but I did not send any request for bad link removal but when I will try then I will response on that letters.
Very very Thanks !
I personally haven’t come across this type of fake link removal request but I have had spam where people will dry by post on my blog and try to say, “dear blog owner, we noticed that your site is missing proper meta tags”. Then they offer their SEO services. It’s a interesting take but I haven’t bitten yet.
I think I’ll pass on their services.
People should be more scrupulous with link removal and the inconsistencies you highlight can be attributed to other types of communication spam as well.Great post.
You can check my profile on Odesk. I am not active on peopleperhour site.
https://www.odesk.com/users/~01ff7508d5079702ec
Then, decide if I am fake or helpful freelancer.
I just dont like to argue on this writer, I still have many clients to help on link removal project.
Thank you
I believe, you should probably dig more and search more about this freelancer before making some bad comments on his reputation. I Search for him on Odesk and he is doing pretty good on this category and have a lot of positive feedbacks on his profile. He might not been active on peopleperhour, but I think a Pro on other Website like Odesk.com. He could be a beginner that time you wrote this but I feel that you don’t have to mentioned his name and the website he was working on.
Good luck on writing.