The Most Important Thing on Social Media: Do Not Pose as, Be a Legit User
Can it be that gaming social media sites is really the way to go? You can find such a suggestion all over the place even today. It seems ethics is contrary to marketing.
Legit blogs, bad advice
Many blogs that are considered a legit source for good marketing information have disappointed me with such flawed advice. People really suggest “to game” social media sites.
I don’t say that it’s bogus but it’s wrong on many levels and people who follow it might even get banned. Most importantly though such posts are the outcome of the wrong mindset.
It’s a mindset I call the SEO 1.0 mindset where people exploit social media instead of actively contributing to it in a positive manner.
Now who I am to teach such well known social media marketing blogger like this? Some people would perhaps refer to me as “power user”.
I have 5k, 10k or even 100k followers on social sites like Twitter, Google+ or Pinterest due to my years of active participation there.
Fake it till you make it?
I will debunk the myths spread in this post. While it attempts to sound legitimate between the lines there is the “SEO 1.0 mindset” shining through. The author states for example:
the algorithm is a very smart one so you have to make it look what you are doing is pretty legit.
This above sentence is a fundamental mistake. When you attempt to pose as a legit user you’ll never be one.
It’s about being a legit user though what makes you successful. I never had to pose as a real user because I was from day one.
How to be legit without posing
How you can accomplish that? Do not pose as, be a legit user!
- Be yourself.
- Share what you really like not what you think others will like.
- Do not share only work stuff like business and marketing, share arts, photography, science pages as people on social media are mostly there to discover inspiring things not for business reasons.
- Express yourself.
- Do not share solely for numbers but for quality.
Now this is obviously a SEO blog so you probably wonder where the promotion comes in. In SEO 2.0 we don’t do obvious, sneaky or posing as somebody else self promotion.
Exploitation vs participation
SEO 2.0 is not about exploiting social sites, it’s about using them to the max in accordance with the rules and to please the community. Do not promote yourself to promote yourself!
While conventional search engine optimization often is about aggressive self promotion SEO 2.0 relies on human nature.
Those who give the most are the most popular.
Ever wondered why presidential candidates promise tax cuts before each election?
The more accepted you get on social media the more people will trust and follow you and the more you’ll content gets shared.
Often I’m amazed at how even the least social media compatible posts at SEO 2.0 get shared and gain traction.
Sometimes I see my articles get shared even before I can fix my typos.
A while ago I made the mistake of adding an image after publishing a post so that it was shared without the image and thus got less attention.
I don’t have to “rotate my network” or something. The only thing I have to do from time to time is stopping my most eager readers.
I tell my fans to NOT promote me anymore as three or more shares in a row rather hurt me than help. This is no joke.
Give people what they want
Some people who ask me for a share their content feel obliged to share mine and then I always say “only if you really like it”. I don’t need vote exchange or anything like this.
Also I never actively send instant messages to a group of people to share my content.
This way you’ll never know whether your content is truly popular or whether you just succeeded at artificially pushing it.
Next time you post similar content again because you think it what people want and nothing happens.
You have to find a topic that most people are interested in. Such topics are of course:
- the social site itself
- free tools
Some of my most popular success stories with more than 10k page views covered those topics.
Examples of success and failure
The Internet lies post took me just an hour to write but was viewed more than 10k times with most people coming via social media.
The post successfully combined two popular topics Internet and humor. My social media friends largely ignored it btw.
Finally there are 2 pieces of advice in this article that are really true but are often abused by people too eager to promote themselves: Reviewing other stumblers and sending messages to those sharing interests with you.
I recently get more “targeted” messages like “Hey You, I see you like aviation too, check out my [insert sales pitch here]!”. In case it’s a sales pitch or it sucks for other reasons I won’t share it.
I might even report you as spam like the guy who wrote me “I see you like x” just because I used the tag a few times.
For the heroic reader I will disclose my mind boggling secret social media popularization tricks!
There are of course some techniques I use sometimes to speed up or enhance the process of being shared. They are pretty common sense and are in not overtly self promotional but they work.
- Often I will announce a new post on Twitter to my followers. I rarely ask for a retweet but I almost always get retweeted minutes after the announcement.
- I will share my postings Google+ and then people may notice them and tweet them too.
- After getting shared I say thank you to each and every person who has shared my content.
- I often also ask a question to start a conversation around my content or the topic in general. I also do this with third party content I share whenever possible.
The key for success on social media sites is being known as a legit user throughout several platforms. I’m active on Twitter, Google+, Inbound.org when it comes to content dealing with my work.
It’s also about being able to cover topics everybody cares about. Any artificial way of posing as someone else or feigning interest in other people will hurt you in the long run.
Don’t pose as a legit user, be one!
Last updated: June 26th, 2017. Overhauled on June 26th, 2015: Rewritten to make it more relevant to social media in general, not StumbleUpon.
* (CC BY-ND 2.0) Creative Commons image by Jared Keener
That is really cool info, exploiting and spamming social networks is really bad and should be avoided.
If I like some thing, I usually stumble it also there is no point going on the stumble begging.
Exploiting blogs for keyword backlinks should also be avoided. The form says “name” not “keywords”. Thus I deleted them. I’m in a good mood today so I won’t delete your link. On other days I will.
What I never quite understood is if most of SU generated traffic is generated by followers or by simply stumbling around, I’m pretty new to actively using SU, so I’m sorry if this is somewhat stupid question to ask :D
Oh, and what are those keyword backlinks you just mentioned?
Julian: Neither followers nor “stumbling around”. The SU algo is a complex combination of both and many more factors.
“keyword backlinks?” Are you kidding me? Never seen comments like “Thank you, keep it up” by people like “North Carolina Real Estate”?
I know them, I just didn’t know how they were called. Those are pretty annyoing.
I’d have to agree. Transparency is becoming more and more important as web 2.0 sites “grow up” and learn from past abuses. There’s really no reason now not to be yourself.
Our blog has been StumbledUpon and Digged and Mixxed several times.
It brings a spike in the number of visits, but most bounce.
If our blog gets StumbledUpon or Digged the number of visitors is similar.
It is very important who is the bookmarker as there are leaders and laggerds.
Don’t ever bookmark yourself!
I like stumbleupon. But I think this service has very tight registration policy. They don’t allow several account under one IP and computer without permission. Meanwhile I have to share computer with two of my brothers. Fortunately, I have created my SU account before my brothers did.
Glad to see I’m not the only one that doesn’t like digg.
Thanks for the reminder about the tags and categories on stumbleupon. I forget to use them!
Posers are aplenty, and the sad part is that most people do not think that the posers could really be posers.
I see posers the most on Digg, though – sites like Mixx, SU have a much better crowd.
I like your SEO 1.0 vs. 2.0 comparison.
SEO 1.0, unfortunately, is alive and kicking–and not just with respect to SU.
Eventually, one would hope, people would figure out that trying to “beat” systems that are constantly fine-tuned to award legitimate value is inefficient when compared to just providing decent value in the first place.
Then again, there are plenty of goofs out there who still worship at the decimated altars of many “trick the search engine” tricks, so it might be awhile before we see a wholesale shift.
Good advice here. My question is aside from your page being indexed is there really much of a benefit to using Stumble? It brings in traffic but it is mostly untargeted. So if you have a webpage that is already indexed is there a reason to Stumble it?
Stumble Upon pretends to be user driven, but it’s a corporate whore
I used to value stumbleupon traffic until I realized that I had no idea how to properly monetize it. After building a brand new site and getting over 2,000 visitors from Stumble, I had absolutely no earnings. Needless to say, I wasn’t too upset when they flagged my account finally.
Great information, as usual. After reading you post, I began using Stumbleupon, it is very cool and addictive. I tried Digg a year ago and did not like it though. Guess I’m too old for this… :-)
spamming and exploiting social networks and blogs are a really bad idea and should be avoided.
If something catches my fancy, I usually stumble it og digg it. There’s no point to going around begging.
Great post. I just picked up on the stumbleupon hype and am definitely going to try it out after reading your post.